Legal Opinion

Olympia Industrial, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided February 17, 1999No. Consol. 95-10-01339PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOLDBERG, Judge.

In this action, the Court reviews the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) Second Remand Determination, dated August 31, 1998, of the Notice of Final Results of Administrative Revieiv: Heavy Forged Hand Tools, Finished or Unfinished, With or Without Handles, from the People’s Republic of China, 60 Fed.Reg. 49,251 (Sept. 22, 1995) (hereinafter “Remand Results”). 1 Plaintiff, Olympia Industrial Inc. (“Olympia”), a respondent in the underlying administrative review, contests the Remand Results as unsupported by substantial evidence.

The Court exercises jurisdiction…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Olympia Industrial, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Shakeproof Assembly Components, Division of Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  2. Nakornthai Strip Mill Public Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
  3. Luoyang Bearing Factory v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
  4. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
  5. Shakeproof Assembly Components Division of Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API