Legal Opinion

State v. Mizelle

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1971No. 716SC576PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

The defendant makes numerous assignments of error in the trial, but since a new trial is being ordered on one assignment of error, we will refrain from discussing the others as they may not arise on a new trial.

The defendant assigns as error the failure of the trial judge to instruct the jury on proximate cause.

We think this assignment of error is well taken. The trial judge instructed the jury that if Willoughby’s death “was the natural and probable result of” the defendant’s acts, then a verdict of guilty of involuntary manslaughter would follow. This was all the definition…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. PhelpsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. State v. DewittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Keener v. LitsingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. LaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. PopeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API