Legal Opinion

Keener v. Litsinger

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 23, 1971No. 7119SC402PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Plaintiff’s first assignment of error is directed at the failure of the trial judge to define proximate cause in his charge to the jury. This is a valid assignment of error. Although the trial judge referred to proximate cause several times in the charge, nowhere in the charge do we find a proper definition of proximate cause. The closest that the court came to attempting a definition of proximate cause was when the court stated:

“Negligence without proximate cause the defendant is not liable, but negligence must be coupled with proximate cause, the cause without which the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Osborne Ex Rel. Osborne v. Atlantic Ice & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. Mattingly v. NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Nance v. ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Barefoot v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MizelleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Regan v. PlayerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Ward ex rel. Ward v. Worley ex rel. WorleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Cooper-Harris, Inc. v. EscalleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Ford v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API