Legal Opinion

State v. Lane

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 1994No. 938SC459PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

I

Defendant’s first assignment of error raises the question of whether the State’s evidence was sufficient to show that defendant’s act of hitting Gregory Linton was both the actual and legal cause of his death.

In considering a motion to dismiss, the trial court must determine whether substantial evidence of each element of the offense exists. State v. Nichols, 321 N.C. 616, 365 S.E.2d 561 (1988). “Substantial evidence is such relevant evidence as a reasonable person might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” State v. Ginyard, 334 N.C. 155, 158, 431 S.E.2d 11, 13…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. RedfernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. State v. BlairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. 84 Lumber Co. v. BarkleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. State v. MessickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Conti v. Fid. Bank (In re NC & VA Warranty Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API