Legal Opinion

State v. Dewitt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 27, 1960PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPIiggiNS, J.

The defendant relies for a new trial on two assignments of error. Both relate to the court’s charge to the jury. The defendant, now represented by counsel, urgently contends the court gave such undue stress and emphasis to the contentions and evidence for the State as to constitute the charge a powerful summing up for the prosecution.

The somewhat more tangible assignment is addressed to the court’s failure properly to define the crime charged in the bill of indictment. Aside from one or two casual references in giving the State's contentions, the following is the sum total of the court’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. . CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. State v. . SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. State v. . StansellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. State v. PhelpsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. State v. . LowerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. State v. LaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. PopeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. MizelleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API