Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of America

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 6, 1999No. 1 CA-CV 98-0445PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOYES, Judge.

¶ 1 Plaintiff made a claim on her Underin-sured Motorist (“UIM”) coverage. Travelers denied the claim because it had already paid Plaintiff under the liability coverage of that policy. We hold that Plaintiffs UIM claim cannot be denied for that reason, and we limit Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co. v. Tank, 146 Ariz. 33, 703 P.2d 580 (App.1985), to cases in which the UIM claimant is making a claim on someone else’s policy.

I

¶2 The material facts are undisputed. Plaintiff was riding in the family car with Mr. Taylor, her husband, when his negligent driving caused a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Millers Casualty Insurance Co. of Texas v. BriggsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Tissell v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ArringtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  5. Brown v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Travelers Indem. Co. of AmericaArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Taylor v. Travelers Indem. Co. of AmericaArizona Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API