Legal Opinion
Granquist v. Sandberg
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 28, 1990No. C006466PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EVANS, Acting P. J.
In this legal malpractice action, the personal representative of the estate of Robert Badal (plaintiff) appeals from a judgment in favor of Attorney Daniel H. Sandberg (defendant) entered after defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s second amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend. We reverse.
A demurrer challenges only the legal sufficiency of the complaint, not the truth of its factual allegations or the plaintiff’s ability to prove those allegations. (Perdue v. Crocker National Bank (1985) 38 Cal.3d 913, 922 [216 Cal.Rptr. 345, 702 P.2d 503].) The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Royal Globe Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Perdue v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Smith v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Rice v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ferguson v. Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Merenda v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Loube v. LoubeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Arciniega v. Bank of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- HINSHAW, WINKLER, DRAA, MARSH v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.