Loube v. Loube
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEIN, J.
Appellants Arthur A. Loube and Janice Temple filed an action against their former attorneys, the law firm of Loube, Klein, Sacks & Associates. They appeal from a judgment that they take nothing by their complaint and that respondents be awarded attorney fees. We affirm the judgment but reverse the attorney fee award.
Background
Appellants were limited partners in a real estate partnership. They hired respondents to prosecute an action brought by them against general partners Paul Klapper and Robert Yick. Respondents filed a complaint on appellants’ behalf, and ultimately took…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Jackson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Gutierrez v. MofidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hearn v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Douglas E. Barnhart, Inc. v. CMC Fabricators, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Shopoff & Cavallo LLP v. HyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Gutierrez v. GirardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Orozco v. WPV San Jose, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.