Legal Opinion

Arciniega v. Bank of San Bernardino

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 23, 1997No. E016659PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McDANIEL, J. *

Leticia Arciniega (plaintiff) once operated a check-cashing business, styled as Community Financial Services, and in connection therewith maintained a commercial bank account with Bank of San Bernardino, N. A. (defendant). In October of 1986, plaintiff and defendant, along with other merchants in San Bernardino, were the victims of a bogus check passing scam perpetrated by El Faro Construction Co. (El Faro).

The scam worked like this. El Faro opened a checking account with defendant. Over a period of time, there were issued to purported employees of El Faro what appeared…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Ferrari v. Grand Canyon DoriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Munoz v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Valdez v. Taylor Automobile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Jambazian v. BordenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. 24 Hour Fitness, Inc. v. Superior Court of Sonoma Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Tudor Ranches, Inc. v. State Comp. Ins. FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Rice v. CrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Cecala v. NewmanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API