Legal Opinion
L'Homme v. Department of Transportation
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 3, 2002No. AC 21805PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*65 Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff, Kenneth E. L’Homme, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the defendant department of transportation (department) on his complaint brought pursuant to General Statutes § 13a-144, the highway defect statute.1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) excluded evidence of prior, similar conditions and accidents, evidence contained in a department complaint letter and drawing, and evidence of erosion, (2) denied him the opportunity to cross-examine a witness and (3) instructed the jury on the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lukas v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Pagano v. IppolitiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Ormsby v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Marchell v. WhelchelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Davis v. FracassoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Quaranta v. KingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Dinardo Seaside Tower, Ltd. v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2014