Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James Stephen Conroy

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 4, 2014No. 13–1871PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZAGER, Justice.

The Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board filed a complaint against the respondent, James S. Conroy, alleging he violated the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct. After a hearing, a division of the Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court of Iowa found Conroy violated numerous provisions of our rules of professional conduct. The commission recommended we suspend Conroy’s license for six months and require that he complete a basic skills course before being reinstated. Upon our de novo review, we concur in most of the findings of rule violations and agree a six-month…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. MoormanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James C. Van GinkelSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Richard Scott RhinehartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. LickissSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. DaggettSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Royce D. TurnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Michael J. CrossSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Seth Eugene BaldwinSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Heather Marie KingerySupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. David S. KelsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API