Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Lickiss
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
TERNUS, Chief Justice.
This matter comes before us on the report of a division of the Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court of Iowa. See Iowa Ct. R. 35.10. The Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board alleged the respondent, Stephen J. Lickiss, violated ethical rules in four probate matters by neglecting these matters, failing to respond to clients’ inquiries for information, taking probate fees without prior court approval, failing to notify his clients that he had ceased to represent them, and failing to respond to the board’s inquiries. The grievance commission found Lickiss…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. TempletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. LettSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. MoormanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. CaseySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. EarleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James C. Van GinkelSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Brian Jesse NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Matthew M. BolesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James William McCarthySupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James Stephen ConroySupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.