Legal Opinion
Gieszl v. Town of Gilbert
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 5, 1974No. 1 CA-CIV 2631PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Chief Judge.
The main issue on this appeal is the effect of A.R.S. § 19 — 142(B) (1956), which allows the passage of a municipal ordinance as an emergency measure, making it effective immediately, on A.R.S. § 9-471(D) (Supp.1974) which provides that an annexation ordinance shall not become final until 30 days after the first reading of the ordinance.
Appellants Hugh Gieszl and Ruth Gieszl brought an action against the appellee Town of Gilbert seeking to declare void an order annexing certain unincorporated territory to the Town of Gilbert. Insofar as pertinent to the issues to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McKay v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. RiceArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- City of Tucson v. GarrettArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Skinner v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- Faulkner v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pima County v. HeinfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Goodyear Farms v. City of AvondaleArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Citizens for Orderly Development & Environment v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Rural/Metro Fire Dept., Inc. v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. City of St. JohnsArizona Supreme Court · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.