Legal Opinion

Citizens for Orderly Development & Environment v. City of Phoenix

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1975No. 12010PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBSON, Judge,

Court of Appeals.

The controlling issue in this appeal is whether appellant’s complaint seeking to declare a proposed zoning amendment void and to enjoin the City from proceeding with the zoning change is premature. We have taken jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 47(e)(5), Rules of the Supreme Court, Vol. 17A, A.R.S.

Appellant, Citizens for Orderly Development & Environment is a non-profit corporation which brought an action against appellees, City of Phoenix, Eaton International Corporation (Eaton), Indian School Properties (Properties) and Chai Mortgage Corporation (Chai) seeking…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Adams v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Iman v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Iman v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. City of Phoenix v. FehlnerArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Moore v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Martineau v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Pioneer Trust Co. v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Town of Paradise Valley v. Gulf Leisure Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  4. Arizona Ass'n of Providers for Persons with Disabilities v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. City of St. JohnsArizona Supreme Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API