Legal Opinion

In the Matter of John B. Kern

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 27, 2018No. Appellate Case 2017-002083; Opinion 27820PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

*576 **569 In this attorney disciplinary matter, a hearing panel of the Commission on Lawyer Conduct (the Panel) issued a report recommending Respondent John B. Kern be definitely suspended from the practice of law for three years, that he be ordered to pay the costs of disciplinary proceedings, and that he be required to complete the Legal Ethics and Practice **570 Program Ethics School (LEAPPS) as a condition of reinstatement to the practice of law. Neither the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) nor Kern took exception to the Panel's report. For the reasons stated below, we find the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of MarshallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Matter of DobsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. In Re McFarlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  4. In the Matter of SolomonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. LapineOhio Supreme Court · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Callaway v. Quinn.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API