Burgsteiner v. Street-Overland Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
Only the 4th headnote needs to be discussed. Under the facts *142of this case the court properly charged the jury that the plaintiff was entitled to recover. While it appears from the record that the notes given by the purchaser of the automobile were not attested by any officer, they were attested by an individual, and, after proper probate, were admitted to record in Lowndes county, Georgia, where, the property was located. It is provided in section 3318 of the Civil Code (1910) that “the written contract of every such conditional sale shall be executed and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cunningham & Co. v. CuretonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Skinner v. BraswellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Armitage-Herschell Co. v. Muscogee Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Harp v. Patapsco Guano Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Hill v. Ludden & Bates Southern Music HouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Motors Mortgage Corp. v. Purchase-Money Note Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Hampton v. Universal Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Home Finance Co. v. United Motor SalesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Simmons v. Springfield Atlantic BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Associates Discount Corp. v. Lindsey Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.