Legal Opinion
Home Finance Co. v. United Motor Sales
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 4, 1956No. 36029Published
1Opinion of the Court
93 Ga. App. 690 (1956)
92 S.E.2d 718
HOME FINANCE COMPANY
v.
UNITED MOTOR SALES.
36029.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Decided April 4, 1956.
Claud R. Caldwell, for plaintiff in error.
Henry J. Heffernan, Max Rubenstein, contra.
NICHOLS, J.
1. On the first trial of this case, the claimant admitted a prima facie case. This admission admitted that the plaintiff in fi. fa. was a bona fide purchaser of the conditional-sale contract, and necessarily admitted its proper execution and recordation in Richmond County, Georgia; otherwise the plaintiff in fi. fa. could not have had a prima facie case. On the second…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Quillian; Concurrence · Felton.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cunningham & Co. v. CuretonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Armitage-Herschell Co. v. Muscogee Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Bank of Ringgold v. West Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Hubbard v. Andrews & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Smith Motor Car Co. v. Universal Credit Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.