Legal Opinion

Zito v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 21, 1933No. 4894, 4895PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALTZELL, District Judge.

The appellant Prank Zito and a large number of other individuals, together with appellant, the Hubinger Company, a corporation, were charged in an indictment with entering into an' unlawful conspiracy for the purpose of violating the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA). Some of the individual defendants in the indictment were granted separate trials, and a directed verdict of not guilty was ordered for other defendants. The following named persons, however, were convicted and are prosecuting this appeal, namely, Prank Zito, Jasper Blanda, Vincent Salvo, Carl Giganti,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Kohl v. LehlbackSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Wassum v. FeeneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  5. People Ex Rel. Thomson v. BarnettIllinois Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Beneficial Finance CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  2. United States v. FalconeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  3. United States v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  4. Edna Goldstein v. Robert E. Kelleher, United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  5. Paschen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API