Legal Opinion

N.A.H. v. S.L.S.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 11, 2000No. 99SC90PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis

This case concerns the interpretation of Colorado's Uniform Parentage Act (the UPA), and causes us to determine what considerations that Act directs the courts to include in making paternity decisions. Specifically, the case involves a young girl, S.RH., who was born in 1994, when her mother was married to NAH. (Husband). N.A.H. was identified on the birth certificate as her father and accepted the child into his home. However, genetic tests demonstrate that, in fact, S.L.S. (Biological Father) is the biological father of S.R.H. Pursuant to Colorado statutes, both men can claim a presumption…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. McDaniels v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In Re Marriage of RossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  4. R.Mcg. v. J.W.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  5. People v. in the Interest of D.F.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Paternity of CherylMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  2. In the Interest of E.L.M.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Martinez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  4. In re the Marriage of RoosaColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. in Interest of M.BColorado Court of Appeals · 2020

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API