Legal Opinion

State v. Reo

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1974No. 9325PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Chief Judge.

Leo Reo was found guilty of receiving stolen property, as defined and denounced by § 560.270, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S., and his punishment was fixed at imprisonment for a term of two years. He appeals, contending 1) that the State failed to prove he received the property with knowledge that it was stolen, and 2) that the State failed to prove the property was worth more than $50. We reverse and remand.

On August 27, 1971, the home of Dr. Harvey E. Nickols was burglarized. Among the items taken were a portable TV set and a .22 caliber carbine. Defendant was charged with having…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. State v. ZammarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  3. State v. HonigSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. State v. MagersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WebbMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. State v. FlauausMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. State v. ArmstrongMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. State v. DittmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. State v. SteffenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API