Legal Opinion
State v. Flauaus
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided September 24, 1974No. 35354PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GUNN, Judge.
Defendant was convicted by jury of buying stolen property valued at more than $50 in violation of § 560.270 RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S. The penalty assessed was a fine of $1,000. Defendant appeals.
Defendant primarily assigns as error: 1) the trial court’s failure to suppress evidence allegedly obtained through an unlawful search and seizure; 2) the State’s failure to state a prima facie case in its opening statement; 3) the State’s failure to prove defendant’s knowledge that the property purchased was stolen and the failure to prove the value of the property; 4) the trial court’s…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Stanford v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. CollettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. GranberryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. RollieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.