Legal Opinion

State v. Dittman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 13, 1978No. 10871PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BILLINGS, Chief Judge.

Defendant was found guilty by a jury of receiving a stolen hydraulic jack, in violation of § 560.270 RSMo 1969, and sentenced to five years imprisonment. He appeals, contending the trial court erred in overruling his motion for acquittal because the evidence did not show he received the jack or that he knew it was stolen.

In determining the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction on a motion for a judgment of acquittal, the facts in evidence and the favorable inferences reasonably to be drawn therefrom must be considered in the light most favorable to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  3. State v. SimoneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  5. State v. WoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re T.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. State v. NormanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Matter of TMDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API