Rescildo v. R.H. Macy's
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kassal, J.
This personal injury action, which accrued in the State of Connecticut and involves a Connecticut infant plaintiff, raises issues with respect to when, and to what extent, the New York ^borrowing statute”, CPLR 202, may be invoked to import the laws of a foreign forum. For the reasons that *114follow, we "borrow” and apply Connecticut’s Statute of Limitations solely with respect to the defendant found to have been amenable to suit in that State during the relevant period, and we decline to accept the doctrine of renvoi with its circuitous route of return to the New…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Martin v. Julius Dierck Equipment Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Finance One Public Company Limited v. Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Drenis v. HaligiannisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Weiss v. La Suisse, Societe D'AssurancesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Insurance Co. of North America v. ABB Power Generation, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1996
- Durkin v. SheaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.