Legal Opinion
Durkin v. Shea
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 6, 1997No. 95 Civ. 1932(CSH)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, Senior District Judge:
Defendants have moved to dismiss plaintiffs first amended complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and with respect to certain defendants, for lack of personal jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). In the alternative, defendants request a stay of these proceedings until related litigation in the Southern District of California is completed. Plaintiff opposes both applications. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion to dismiss is denied, with the exception of…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Corzin v. Fordu (In Re Fordu)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Medcalf v. Thompson Hine LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Ruffolo v. GarbariniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Ables & Hall BuildersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Pelletreau & PelletreauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.