Legal Opinion

Wesnovtek Corp. v. Wilkins

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 2005No. 2003-0822PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

{¶ 1} This case involves the calculation of the Ohio corporation-franchise-tax liability of Wesnovtek Corporation (“Wesnovtek”), appellee, for the 1988 tax year. The first question we address is whether, based on former R.C. 5733.051, a loss from the bulk sale of inventory must be allocated or apportioned. We then consider whether the Tax Commissioner is required to consider a deviation from the statutory apportionment formula when a corporate taxpayer fails to submit a request for deviation in writing at the time the franchise tax report is filed.

Overview of the Ohio Corporation Franchise Tax

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Borden, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Harsco Corp. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. R.H. Macy & Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Ohio Grocers Association v. WilkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API