Wesnovtek Corp. v. Wilkins
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
{¶ 1} This case involves the calculation of the Ohio corporation-franchise-tax liability of Wesnovtek Corporation (“Wesnovtek”), appellee, for the 1988 tax year. The first question we address is whether, based on former R.C. 5733.051, a loss from the bulk sale of inventory must be allocated or apportioned. We then consider whether the Tax Commissioner is required to consider a deviation from the statutory apportionment formula when a corporate taxpayer fails to submit a request for deviation in writing at the time the franchise tax report is filed.
Overview of the Ohio Corporation Franchise Tax
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Borden, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Harsco Corp. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- R.H. Macy & Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
3Cited by3 opinions
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Ohio Grocers Association v. WilkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2008