Legal Opinion

Borden, Inc. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1990No. 88-1780PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The transaction at issue in this case involved appellant Borden’s sale of depreciable property owned by one of its Florida divisions. All this property was located in Florida and had no situs in Ohio at the time of sale. Because we hold that the meaning of “capital gain” discerned from the Internal Revenue Code cannot be used to allocate income for Ohio’s franchise tax, we reverse the Board of Tax Appeals. We conclude that the General Assembly specifically excluded gains such as these from the reach of the Ohio franchise tax.

R.C. 5733.051 governs the potential allocation of taxable net…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. UBS Financial Services, Inc. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Wesnovtek Corp. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Harsco Corp. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Harsco Corp. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API