Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Beaver City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1912No. 2337PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Fifth District; Hon. Joshua Greenwood, Judge. Action by J. W. Hardy and another against Beaver City and others. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

FRICK, 0. J.

Appellants instituted this proceeding for the purpose of contesting and annulling the result of an election held in Beaver City, Utah. Said election was held pursuant to chapter 106, Laws Utah, 1911, and the question submitted was whether the sale of intoxicating liquors as a beverage should be permitted within said city or not. Upon a hearing the district court entered judgment declaring the election valid, from which judgment this appeal is prosecuted.

1 Before proceeding to a consideration of the questions presented by the record, it becomes necessary to dispose of a preliminary…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Hirsh v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Ritchie v. RichardsUtah Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Farnham v. BolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Treat v. MorrisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Lynip v. BucknerNevada Supreme Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Abrams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Evans v. ReiserUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Harries v. McCreaUtah Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API