Treat v. Morris
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Spink County. Hon. Arva A. Tayror, Judge. Contest by T. M. Treat against W. A. Morris and others of an election upon the question of selling intoxicating liquor at retail. From a judgment for respondents, contestants appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOY, J.
At the municipal election held in the city of Redfield, Spink county, on the 3d Tuesday of April, 1909, under the provisions of article 14, c. 14, Pol. Code, the question of “Shall intoxicating liquors be sold at retail?” was submitted to the voters. The canvassing board certified that a majority of the voters of said city had voted in favor of such sale. The appellant, as an elector, thereupon, in due time, instituted an election contest against the city council, mayor, city auditor, and those applying for a license to sell intoxicating liquors for the year beginning July 1, 1909. This…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Edwards v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
- Vallier v. BrakkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- McMahon v. PolkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- Bloedel v. CromwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- McKittrick v. PardeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ward v. FletcherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Briggs v. GhristSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Krakowski v. WaskeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Tschetter v. RaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Warren v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.