Legal Opinion
Crockett v. Boysen
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 12, 1960No. 1-59-Civ.-270PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEVITT, Chief Judge.
This is a motion for reconsideration of this court’s order entered May 26, 1960 denying third-party defendant’s (State Farm) motion for a separate trial of the issues between the original defendant (Boysen) and State Farm.
*149The controversy arises as a result of an automobile accident on August 19, 1957 near Stewartville, Minnesota, involving the plaintiff (Crockett) and Boy-sen. Crockett commenced a personal injury action for $75,000 in the state district court against Boysen. Thereafter, Boysen impleaded State Farm under Rule 14.01, Rules of Civil Procedure for the District…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bowie v. SorrellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
- Ostrowski v. MockridgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Odegard v. ConnollySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Martin v. SchiskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Schevling v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Paris Air Crash of March 3, 1947District Court, C.D. California · 1975
- Greear v. John Long Trucking, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1967