Legal Opinion

Odegard v. Connolly

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 5, 1941No. Nos. 33,031-36, 33,062-64PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

Each defendant appeals from the order denying a new trial. Defendant Gallagher also appeals from the judgment in each of the three cases.

At about 3:45 p. m. June 7, 1940, a collision between a Buick coupé, driven by defendant Cleland (Gallagher) easterly on the four-lane through highway No. 7 (Excelsior boulevard) and a Chevrolet sedan, driven by defendant Connolly, took place as the latter, driving north on Twelfth avenue in Hopkins, entered No. 7, turning westerly. Plaintiffs Carey and Mary McCulloch, guest passengers in the Buick, were thrown out and seriously injured. There…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tanner v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. King v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Bauer v. ReavellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  4. McCurdy v. FlibotteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cameron v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Carpenter v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Schmitt v. EmerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. Cofran v. SwanmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Krohn v. NJ Full Ins. UnderwritersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API