Legal Opinion

In re Paris Air Crash of March 3, 1947

District Court, C.D. California

Decided November 20, 1975No. MDL 172PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER FOR SEPARATE TRIALS

PEIRSON M. HALL, Senior District Judge.

The general nature of the cases arising from the Paris air crash of March 3, 1974, and the resulting complexities are set out in the Memorandum of this Court on the question of the applicable choice of law on damages, filed August 1, 1975, D.C., 399 F.Supp. 732, and need not be repeated here except as necessary.

The matter immediately before the Court involves the various motions for separate trials, and the oppositions thereto, filed by the several parties in these cases.

It first appeared that the motions…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Buckeye Boiler Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Ault v. International Harvester Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Barth v. B. F. Goodrich Tire Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. A-Plus Janitorial & Carpet Cleaning v. the Employers' Workers' Compensation Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  2. Stoddard v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1981
  3. Simon v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
  4. In Re Air Crash Disaster Near Chicago, Ill., Etc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
  5. Organic Chemicals, Inc. v. Carroll Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API