Legal Opinion

Martin v. Schiska

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 24, 1931No. 28,311PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Defendant appeals from the order denying judgments notwithstanding the verdicts or new trials. Two actions, brought against defendant for damages sustained by the plaintiffs when an automobile owned by defendant and operated by her alleged, agent or servant upset because of the latter’s negligence, Avere tried together and separate verdicts rendered, the one for $8,000 in favor of the plaintiff Pearl Martin, whose left hand was so cut at the wrist as permanently to destroy its use, and the other for $4,000 in favor of the other plaintiff, her husband, for the consequential damages* to him…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Slater v. Advance Thresher Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Pope v. HalpernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Kokesh v. PriceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Hartnett v. GryzmishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Farthing v. HepinstallMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Balle v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Horneman v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Hinman v. GouldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. Morton v. HolscherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API