Legal Opinion

People v. Brazeau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 22, 1990PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence presented at trial in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Ford, 66 NY2d 428, 437), we find that there was a valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences to lead a rational person to the conclusion reached by the jury (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). On this record, we also conclude that the

*980verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, supra). Further, we find no error in the trial court’s refusal to charge that the People’s primary witness was an accomplice (see,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. TaranovichNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. VatajNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. People v. AleschusNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. FaulknerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. People v. TullochAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. People v. La PorteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. People v. DygertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. People v. DelacruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API