People v. Tulloch
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
We find no merit to the defendant’s contention that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial. The five factors which are to be examined in balancing the merits of *795whether a defendant has been denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial are the extent delay, the reason for the delay, the nature of the underlying charge, whether or not there has been an extended period of pretrial incarceration, and whether or not there is any indication that the defense has been impaired by reason of the delay (see, People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442).
Although approximately 11 years elapsed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. TaranovichNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. CasassaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. MoyeNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. McLaurinNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. BrattonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. MurdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. FelixAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. MoralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. MossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.