Legal Opinion
Dwyer v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 27, 1985No. 100-85CPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
Defendant has moved to stay this action “in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1500 (1982).” Plaintiffs oppose.
FACTS
On February 20, 1985, plaintiffs filed a complaint in this court alleging several causes of action sounding in contract pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1) (1982). According to the complaint, prior to February 1982, plaintiffs became interested in purchasing the Coulee Springs Ranch (the “Ranch”) from the then-owners, the Her-mans. At that time title was subject to mortgages held by the previous owners, Corning & Sons, and the Farm Home Administration (the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Merritt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Matson Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- British American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
- City of Alexandria v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Biagioli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Unr Industries, Inc., Unarco Industries, Inc. And Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. The United States, Keene Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Hill v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Klamath Irrigation District v. the United States 01-591l and 01-5910l Through 01United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Branch v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.