Legal Opinion
Branch v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 20, 1993No. 93-133CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion under RCFC 12(b)(1) to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendant claims that the court lacks jurisdiction over plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1500 (1988), which precludes the Court of Federal Claims from having jurisdiction over any claim based on the same operative facts as a suit filed in another federal court. Plaintiff has opposed and argument is deemed unnecessary.
FACTS
The following facts are undisputed, unless otherwise noted. Dr. Ben Branch (“plaintiff”) is the Chapter 7…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Unr Industries, Inc., Unarco Industries, Inc., and Eagle Picher Industries, Inc. v. The United States, Keene Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Lucas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mastrolia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- d'Abrera v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Klamath Irrigation District v. the United States 01-591l and 01-5910l Through 01United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Eastern Shawnee Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Griffin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.