Legal Opinion
Hill v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 27, 1985No. 79-85CPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge:
This opinion addresses defendant’s motion to dismiss, under RUSCC 12(b)(1), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1500 (1982). Plaintiff strenuously opposes the motion on the premise that the operative facts make § 1500 inapposite. For the reasons delineated hereinafter, and consistent with the intendment of 28 U.S.C. § 1500, this court is constrained to conclude that said statute is applicable and established precedent mandates that plaintiff’s complaint must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
FACTS
On May 24, 1982, Joan Hill…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Matson Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Tecon Engineers, Inc., a Corporation and Related Cases v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Casman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- British American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
- Corona Coal Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Loveladies Harbor, Inc. And Loveladies Harbor, Unit D, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Passamaquoddy Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Unr Industries, Inc., Unarco Industries, Inc. And Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. The United States, Keene Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Levy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.