Legal Opinion
Budik v. Howard University Hospital
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-1191PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge
The pro se plaintiff, Dr. Edith M. Budik, filed this action against the defendants, Howard University Hospital (“Howard”) and Dr. Andre J. Duerinckx, alleging invasion of privacy, fraud, misrepresentation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a) (2012), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (2012). See Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 25-32. Currently before the Court are the Defendants’…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Massaquoi v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- JANE DOE v. BERNABEI & WACHTEL, PLLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Brady v. United States Capitol PoliceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Alvarado v. Rainbow Inn, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Beaulieu v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.