Legal Opinion
Edna Marzuki v. At & T Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 20, 1989No. 87-2361PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff-appellant, Edna Marzuki, was employed by the defendant-appellee, AT & T Technologies, Inc. (AT & T or company), in a position that was covered by a collective bargaining agreement. When she was discharged, she filed a grievance pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement. While this grievance was pending, Ms. Marzuki filed a claim in state court. The district court granted AT & T’s motion to remove the claim to federal court and then dismissed the claim on the authority of Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc., 823 F.2d 1031 (7th Cir.1987) (en…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- James R. Sullivan v. James P. Conway and International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Matthew Burda v. M. Ecker CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Coe v. County of CookCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Hicks v. Resolution Trust Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- In re Bluffton Casting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.