Legal Opinion

United States v. Al Lee Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 18, 1976No. 75--2424PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel in this direct criminal appeal. In connection with this action, counsel has submitted a document styled “Appellant’s Brief” which contains a brief history of the case and the statement that “counsel for appellant has searched the record and has failed to find anything in the record that might arguably support the appeal.”

In Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), the United States Supreme Court carefully delineated the duties of court-appointed counsel in the prosecution of his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. FloresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. Leslie EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. CorderoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Charles K. Griffy and Emma GriffyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Government of the Canal Zone v. Gil Antonio Jimenez G. (Gonzalez)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API