United States v. Cordero
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Victor Cordero, Gustavo Pacheco, and Ruben Pichardo appeal their convictions of possession with intent to distribute marihuana and conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marihuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Finding no error, we affirm.
I
All three defendants challenge the sufficiency of the evidence underlying their convictions. We consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and determine whether a rational jury could have found the essential elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt, giving the government the benefit of all reasonable…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Jaleh NazemianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Salatil Pruneda-Gonzalez, Alejandro Tamayo-Ramos, Heraclio Pena-Hernandez, and Ignacio Hernandez-BeltranCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Hugo Lopez, Juan Trujillo and Hernando VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. CalverleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- People v. JacksonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- United States v. VidacakCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Manoucheka CharlesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Martinez-GaytanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.