United States v. Charles K. Griffy and Emma Griffy
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Appellants Charles and Emma Griffy appeal from their convictions, after a jury verdict, on six counts of tax evasion in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201 for the years 1980 through 1985. We vacate submission and order additional briefing.
Appellants’ court-appointed counsel filed a brief that summarized the proceedings in the district court, recited the facts of the case, and stated that counsel had reviewed the record and “located no specific issues” for appeal. Counsel did not say the appeals were frivolous and did not move to withdraw. He stated he had served appellants with a copy of the brief…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. WendeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- People v. FeggansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- United States v. Leslie EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Abel MARTINEZ-SALAZAR, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Dwayne A. DAVIS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. M.C. KRAMER, Respondent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Gustav W. SkurdalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Lee Robbins v. George Smith, Warden, California Department of Corrections, Lee Robbins v. George SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- People v. HackettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.