Legal Opinion

Junker v. Hustes

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1888No. 12,790PublishedCited by 33 opinions

From the Ohio Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellee filed a written motion wherein he stated that he had obtained judgment against Abraham Junker and Caroline Junker, his wife, for four hundred and forty-nine dollars, and that they had obtained judgment against him for five hundred dollars. The relief sought by the motion is that the one judgment be set off against the other.

The appellants answered the motion by averring that they claimed the judgment held by them as exempt under the law. Each averred that a schedule was duly filed, set forth the schedules, and respectively alleged that they demanded that their respective…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haas v. ShawIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Puett v. BeardIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Butner v. BowserIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Denver & R. G. R. v. RodderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Pomeroy v. BeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Watts v. Evansville, Mt. Carmel & Northern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Murphy v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1909

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API