Pomeroy v. Beach
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Porter Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.
This action was brought against appellants by the appellees, and an affidavit in garnishment was filed under the provisions of the act of 1897 (Acts 1897, p. 233). There was a special finding of the facts and the conclusions of law stated thereon, in which the court held, in substance, that under the provisions of said act of 1897 only $25.00 of the wages of appellant Pomeroy, a resident householder, was exempt from seizure for the payment of said indebtedness, and rendered judgment accordingly.
Appellants contend, among other things, that said act of 1897 is in conflict with the provisions of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Walsh v. State ex rel. SoulesIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Junker v. HustesIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- City of Madison v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Butner v. BowserIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Astley v. CapronIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Parks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Cain v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Union National Bank v. FinleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Matter of ZumbrunIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Frederick H. McNaughton v. The New York Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.