McCall v. Ikon
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
KITTREDGE, J.:
This is an appeal from the denial of relief from default judgment under Rule 60(b), SCRCP. Appellant raises two exceptions to the default judgment: (1) that the default was in error because it was never properly served with the plaintiffs summons and complaint, and (2) alternatively, even if service were proper, it was not notified of the subsequent damages hearing concerning this unliquidated claim. We join the circuit court in rejecting Appellant’s first exception, finding service of process was effective, but we agree with Appellant’s second argument that notice of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roche v. Young Bros., Inc., of FlorenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Tri-County Ice and Fuel Co. v. Palmetto Ice Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Moore v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- Long v. Carolina Baking Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Griffin v. Capital CashCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson v. Cintas Corp. No. 2Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- McClurg v. DeatonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- McCall v. IKONCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Johnson v. Cintas Corp. No. 2Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
- Honorage Nursing Home of Florence, S.C., Inc. v. Florence Convalescent Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.