Moore v. Simpson
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Huff, Judge:
Appellants, Mary Joe Moore and Charlotte Ann Smith, appeal an order of the trial judge quashing service of their summons and complaint based on insufficiency of service of process. We affirm.
FACTS
In February 1994, counsel for appellants notified respondent David E. Simpson of Kimball, Dove & Simpson that an investigation was under way to determine the validity of a claim by the appellants against Simpson for legal malpractice. In May 1994, Simpson, both individually and on behalf of the law firm, agreed to toll the statute of limitations until June 6, 1994. Ultimately, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Roche v. Young Bros., Inc., of FlorenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- West v. PaigeDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1993
- Jensen Ex Rel. Estate of Wallace v. DoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
- Hamilton v. DavisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
- Lawson v. JeterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
3Cited by14 opinions
- Whaley v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Bowman v. Weeks Marine, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1996
- Richardson v. P v. Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- McClurg v. DeatonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Carolina Emergency Physicians, P.A.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.