Legal Opinion

McClurg v. Deaton

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 20, 2008No. 4458PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*567HUFF, J.:

Harrell Wayne Deaton and New Prime, Inc. appeal from an order of the trial court denying their motions to set aside a default judgment in favor of Ann F. and Steve McClurg in the amount of $800,000. We affirm.

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Ann McClurg, along with her husband Steve, instituted this action for injuries Ann received as a passenger in a car involved in an August 5, 2002 motor vehicle accident with a truck owned by New Prime and driven by New Prime’s employee, Deaton. New Prime was insured by Zurich North America under a commercial trucker’s general liability policy containing…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Schultz v. ButcherCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  2. Roche v. Young Bros., Inc., of FlorenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Tri-County Ice and Fuel Co. v. Palmetto Ice Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Graham v. Town of LorisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  5. Mitchell Supply Co. v. GaffneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McClurg v. DeatonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Narruhn v. Alea London Ltd.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  3. Conits v. ConitsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
  4. Williams v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  5. Itc Commercial Funding, LLC v. CrerarCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API