Bailey v. Hoffman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendants to recover on a book account. The defendants filed a joint answer. The action was tried before the court sitting without a jury. The court made findings of fact in favor of the plaintiff, and from a judgment entered thereon the defendants have appealed and have brought up a bill of exceptions which, on its face, appears to be a digest only of the proceedings below.
The plaintiff makes a preliminary objection to the hearing of the appeal. He calls attention to the fact that more than sixty days elapsed between 'the date the judgment was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carter v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Furlow Pressed Brick Co. v. Balboa Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Wright v. LoaizaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tillson v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Egan v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Gardner v. RutherfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Anderson v. Calaveras Central Mining Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Robin v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.