Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Hoffman

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 7, 1929No. Docket No. 6676PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendants to recover on a book account. The defendants filed a joint answer. The action was tried before the court sitting without a jury. The court made findings of fact in favor of the plaintiff, and from a judgment entered thereon the defendants have appealed and have brought up a bill of exceptions which, on its face, appears to be a digest only of the proceedings below.

The plaintiff makes a preliminary objection to the hearing of the appeal. He calls attention to the fact that more than sixty days elapsed between 'the date the judgment was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carter v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Furlow Pressed Brick Co. v. Balboa Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Wright v. LoaizaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tillson v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Egan v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Gardner v. RutherfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Anderson v. Calaveras Central Mining Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Robin v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API