Gardner v. Rutherford
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.
Respondent G. C. Gardner and Prank Poneeitta were partners in a business known as the “Napa Valley Creamery” from December, 1923, to January 1, 1927. Shortly before January 1, 1927, they incorporated under the name of “Ambrosia Creamery, Inc.,” and on that date transferred all the assets of the Napa Valley Creamery to the new corporation, and had the corporation assume all the liabilities of the partnership. Eighty-nine per cent of the stock was issued to respondent Gardner and eleven per cent to Poneeitta, but three of these shares were issued to three other persons in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Erkenbrecher v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Hollywood Cleaning & Pressing Co. v. Hollywood Laundry Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Moss v. Underwriters' Report, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Carter v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Furlow Pressed Brick Co. v. Balboa Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Parker v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- H. S. Mann Corp. v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,031 in Re Roberts Farms Incorporated, Debtor. Roberts Farms Incorporated v. Glenn Bultman John KellyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Filmservice Laboratories, Inc. v. Harvey Bernhard Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Manney & Co. v. Texas Reserve Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.