Legal Opinion · Dissent

Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Reedsburg Bank

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1961Published

1DissentHallows, J.

I do not agree that we can treat the decision of the trial court as an order. The facts of this case are not governed by Will of Jansen (1923), 181 Wis. 83, 85, 193 N. W. 972, Will of Pattison (1926), 190 Wis. 289, 298, 207 N. W. 292, and State ex rel. Zilisch v. Auer (1928), 197 Wis. 284, 287, 288, 221 N. W. 860, 223 N. W. 123.

In Boehm v. Wermuth (1927), 194 Wis. 82, 215 N. W. 818, this court was careful to point out the importance of separating findings of fact and conclusions of law from the opinion or decision because they are distinct and separate and should not be confused or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Zilisch v. AuerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Homberger v. WilleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Will of Robinson v. RobinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Barrock v. BarrockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  5. State Ex Rel. Chinchilla Ranch, Inc. v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API